Skip to main content

securetmp on centos 7 error

rhm.geerts
Hello. I installed Cpanel on a Centos 7.4 server. Everthing went fine and looks working. Now I tried to secure my tmp partition and I get this error: [quote]*** Notice *** No loop module detected If the loopback block device is built as a module, try running `modprobe loop` as root via ssh and running this script again. If the loopback block device is built into the kernel itself, you can ignore this message.
I've found a couple of threads about this on the cpanel forums and it said try "modprobe loop" which doesn't give me any result: root@srv ~ # modprobe loop root@srv ~ #
How can I fix this?

Comments

5 comments

Date Votes
  • cPanelLauren
    Hello, Can you provide the output of /etc/fstab and can let us know if this is a vz or open vz server? Thank you,
    0
  • rhm.geerts
    Hello. I tried to make it a 10 GB /tmp but it looks like it only made 4 GB. proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 /dev/md/0 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/md/1 /boot ext3 defaults 0 0 /dev/md/2 / ext4 usrjquota=quota.user,jqfmt=vfsv0 0 0 /usr/tmpDSK /tmp ext3 defaults,noauto 0 0
    This is my df -h output at the moment: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md2 1.8T 6.4G 1.7T 1% / devtmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 16G 17M 16G 1% /run tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/md1 488M 184M 279M 40% /boot /dev/loop0 3.9G 8.4M 3.7G 1% /tmp tmpfs 3.2G 0 3.2G 0% /run/user/0
    The server is no VPS, it's a real dedicated server running Centos 7.4, no virtualization. Thank you.
    0
  • cPanelLauren
    Hello, By default it's 4GB you want to look at this thread which addresses this issue:
    0
  • rhm.geerts
    Oke thank you, but it's working correctly? I don't need to worry about the "loop module" not being detected notice?
    0
  • cPanelLauren
    Hello, It's there and seems to be configured correctly you can confirm this by running: losetup -f in this case it appears to be the second notice: If the loopback block device is built into the kernel itself, you can ignore this message. Thank you,
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

New post