Skip to main content

Exim via Mailgun causing 'on behalf of' to appear

Comments

10 comments

  • cPanelLauren
    Hi @ServerMan1984 I believe this may be modifiable but it needs to be done at mailgun their documentation can be found here Mailgun Documentation " Mailgun API documentation Thanks!
    0
  • ServerMan1984
    Thanks, We decided to move to AWS instead. More reasonable and straightforward to setup.
    0
  • cPanelLauren
    Hi @ServerMan1984 I'm glad to hear that you were able to get the issue resolved even if you did need to move providers to do so, thank you for following up!
    0
  • ServerMan1984
    Thanks, Although, I would still like to know the ideal WHM setup on Google Cloud Platform for multiple domains. There are guides out there that allude to this issue but I haven't come across a detailed and workable solution to this. If we can get a solution that would be fantastic as we would rather keep all our VMs in one place.
    0
  • cPanelLauren
    HI @ServerMan1984 We have this Install cPanel with Google Compute Engine | cPanel Blog but as far as "ideal" I don't have any suggestions it's a really relative term what may be ideal for you isn't for me and vice versa. Thanks!
    0
  • ServerMan1984
    I guess by ideal I mean what WHM's main purpose is, that is to manage multiple vhosts/domains/sites. The above link covers most aspects in that regard but doesn't deal with the key issue of emails in depth.
    0
  • cPanelLauren
    There shouldn't be much in terms of email in respect to setting up a server with them though, maybe I'm not following? Once the server is set up/configured you should not need a 3rd party mail provider.
    0
  • ServerMan1984
    Google blocks all outgoing traffic from port 25, so it is virtually impossible to setup a mail server on Google Cloud, and that's why the blog mentioned above suggests 3rd party mail services.
    0
  • cPanelLauren
    Sure, you can use 3rd party mail services but cPanel allows you to easily set exim to listen on a non-standard port an option which is also discussed in their kb article here
    0
  • Supamic
    This workaround solved it for me!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.