Skip to main content

NFS vs Rsync

Comments

2 comments

  • cPanelLauren
    First of all I want to point out that cPanel has not ever supported NFS with backups or otherwise. This is noted in the backup documentation as follows: [QUOTE="https://docs.cpanel.net/whm/backup/backup-configuration/82/#configure-backup-directory"> We strongly recommend that you do not perform backups to remote filesystems (for example, NFS, CIFS, smbfs, or other types of network drive systems). While you can back up directly to a remote filesystem, cPanel & WHM does not support this configuration. We strongly recommend that you work with a qualified system administrator to manage this custom backup path and avoid potential risks.
    I'm not sure I understand what you mean here:
    My question would there be any speed benefit by using an RSYNC server instead of NFS for the backup operations? I realize that the incremental backup is using RSYNC on the NFS mount but I wasn't sure if there were any efficiencies in the RSYNC protocol that aren't there in NFS?

    rsync is a daemon a tool used to perform a specific task where NFS is a filesystem type.
    0
  • sozotech
    First of all I want to point out that cPanel has not ever supported NFS with backups or otherwise. This is noted in the backup documentation as follows: I'm not sure I understand what you mean here: rsync is a daemon a tool used to perform a specific task where NFS is a filesystem type.

    To be more specific, would incremental backups to RSYNC be faster than NFS over the same speed network?
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.