AccelerateWP versus LiteSpeed Cache For WordPress on CloudLinux

spaceman

• December 22, 2023 11:45
• Edited

Hi All, I notice that AccelerateWP is now available for CloudLinux (CL) servers running Litespeed: We're currently running CL Standard, not Pro, and AccelerateWP runs on Pro, not Standard. So I have to consider whether it's worth upgrading from CL Standard to CL Pro in order to be able to deploy AccelerateWP in favour of LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress. (Doubtless it's a v bad idea (probably impossible?) to run both AccelerateWP and LiteSpeed Cache for WP at the same time!) Does anyone have any suggestions or experiences to share in this regard? Thanks, Ross

• 

  ffeingol

  • June 28, 2023 13:26

  This is prob. more of a question for the LSWS folks. Since LiteSpeed Cache is built by the LiteSpeed team, I would have a hard time believing that any 3rd party cache can work better.

  0
• 

  Duplika

  • October 24, 2023 01:44

  I'm having the same question myself, specially since AccelerateWP Premium is so far, the only way to provide secure object cache for WordPress, in a shared hosting environment where cache is shared between all users, having potential security issues. Still, we are trying to avoid having for offer a paid upgrade to pay the $ 1,2 per site AccelerateWP Premium costs. Did anyone test Redis via Containers on CloudLinux?

  0
• 

  JoseDieguez

  • October 24, 2023 13:56

  very happy with LSCache, we disable accelerateWP on all our servers.

  0
• 

  Duplika

  • October 25, 2023 00:51

  I've shared a suggestion with the LiteSpeed team to hopefully, they create something like their

  0
• 

  gnusys

  • October 30, 2023 10:49

  You can have per user redis compatible with Litespeed cache using third-party plugin

  0
• 

  spaceman

  • December 22, 2023 11:53

  UPDATE: I'm not sure if, 6 months ago, I was correct when I stated:
  
  "We're currently running CL Standard, not Pro, and AccelerateWP runs on Pro, not Standard"
  
  But now (Dec '23) I can see that AccelerateWP is available to us with CloudLinux Standard (CL v.7.9 on one server and 8.9 on another).
  
  If you ARE running CloudLinux but NOT Litespeed, then you'd use AccelerateWP, because LSCWP isn't available.
  
  Conversely, if you're NOT running CloudLinux but ARE running Litespeed, then you'd use LSCWP because AccelerateWP isn't available.
  
  The dilemma comes when you're running both, like we are on two servers.

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.