Skip to main content

Is this user level filter rule appropiate?

Comments

3 comments

  • 24x7ss
    Hello :) It looks fine to me but if you are having issues with specific domain/subject, you might want to consider creating rule with it instead of spam score. Also, account level filtering would be good option as well.
    0
  • cPanelMichael
    Hello :) Did your hosting provider offer a reason on why the issue could not be resolved? It's likely a better idea to address the actual issue with SpamAssassin instead of implementing a workaround like this. Thank you.
    0
  • companero
    ]Hello :) Did your hosting provider offer a reason on why the issue could not be resolved? It's likely a better idea to address the actual issue with SpamAssassin instead of implementing a workaround like this. Thank you.

    Michael, no help at all, i replied to you in the original thread. It is sad that some admins preffer to just blame the software instead of looking for an answer. They talked about "conflicts" and spamassassin not being "robust", funny no? [COLOR="silver">- - - Updated - - - By the way this rule which i originally posted is flawed so do not use it unless you replace: User level filtering -> New Rule -> Spam status contains 7. or 8. or 9. or 10. -> Discard message To User level filtering -> New Rule -> Spam status contains score=7. or score=8. or score=9. or 10. -> Discard message I noticed that many legit emails which were tagged as NO spam, were being deleted because the score was something like score=-98.4 and since "8." is contained, then it was wrongly discarded I added the score= but im looking for a better workaround which i hope helps everybody here with fighting spam
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.