km9
- Total activity 39
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 2
- Subscriptions 8
Comments
Recent activity by km9-
Hi again, I've now had a chance to do more work on this and I've found the problem: The regex was, in fact, working exactly as it should. The confusion was caused because there was a conflicting em...
-
Hi, Thanks for following this up for me. Creating a ticket is not something I can do, sorry, but I will do some more investigation and let you know if I find anything else out. I did suspect that t...
-
Hi, Firstly, thank you for taking the time to comment. I appreciate it. Secondly, I'm so sorry, I should have been clearer. When I said 'delivered to the spam folder' I actually meant that the ema...
-
Many thanks for the response. I've managed to work around the limitation in the meantime by using a regex on the received headers.
-
Any news on this? I can't find any information on what headers "Any-header" actually looks at, but apparently it doesn't include "Return-Path", which would be very useful!
-
The syntax is not quite right, and testing just the "To:" header will deliver copies of all mail that is specifically addressed to those destinations. (not cc'd or bcc'd) Want to save all outgoing...
-
Hello, We made some updates to the Dovecot configuration in cPanel 64 that affects template customization. Here's the relevant section from the
-
Hello @km9, Regarding this filter: It's true the "deliver" action is considered a significant delivery. However, as I understand, Exim will still process the rules in the same filter. For insta...
-
46563 Maybe it's just me misunderstanding this, from 3. Exim Filters above: If at least one significant delivery is set up, the filter is considered to have handled the entire delivery arrangemen...
-
Michael, any comment on my message #3 above? Why doesn't this stop after the first successful delivery?