Changing server_names_hash_max_size on nginx always back to defaulr value

lambov

• October 07, 2021 08:41

i am using cpanel with nginx proxy, and i get the following warning when restarting nginx nginx[3271513]: nginx: [warn] could not build optimal server_names_hash, you should increase either server_names_hash_max_size: 1024 or server_names_hash_bucket_size: 128; ignoring server_names_hash_bucket_size then i change server_names_hash_max_size to 16386, but after several time, the value back to 1024 whats wrong about it

• 

  cPRex Jurassic Moderator

  • October 07, 2021 19:22

  Hey there! When you edit the configuration file, are you changing /etc/nginx/conf.d/ea-nginx.conf as outlined here?

  0
• 

  AlphaPrime

  • January 25, 2022 22:31

  I have the same problem and yes, that is the file from the documentation. For some reasons, from time to time, it resets the value to default!

  0
• 

  Bidi

  • January 26, 2022 07:06

  Hello, Same problem to me after making the changes i still get nginx: [warn] could not build optimal server_names_hash, you should increase either server_names_hash_max_size: 1024 or server_names_hash_bucket_size: 256; ignoring server_names_hash_bucket_size nginx: [warn] could not build optimal server_names_hash, you should increase either server_names_hash_max_size: 1024 or server_names_hash_bucket_size: 256; ignoring server_names_hash_bucket_size nginx: [warn] could not build optimal server_names_hash, you should increase either server_names_hash_max_size: 1024 or server_names_hash_bucket_size: 256; ignoring server_names_hash_bucket_size nginx: [warn] could not build optimal server_names_hash, you should increase either server_names_hash_max_size: 1024 or server_names_hash_bucket_size: 256; ignoring server_names_hash_bucket_size I had to increase this to server_names_hash_max_size 2048; server_names_hash_bucket_size 512; after all ok nginx: the configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf syntax is ok nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test is successful I dont know if its to high or not.

  0
• 

  cPRex Jurassic Moderator

  • January 26, 2022 17:56

  I don't think that's too high - I'd expect that to work just fine.

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.