Skip to main content

Change in Clamscan result as of cPanel 100.0.8

Comments

6 comments

  • PeteS
    Thanks for the quick reply. Actually the clamav download bug showed up on 1/31 & 2/1, and the update to 100.0.8 was on 2/3, and to 100.0.9 on 2/4 (for me), but the download bug didn't appear on 2/2 or after. Regardless, it all looks to be fine now. Your second link on the Clamav version seems really confused! I checked and I see Clamav 0.104.0-1.cp11100 in WHM. Or is this a tweaked older version of Clamav to fool their download server? Can you get me the real answer on which version of Clamav cPanel is supposed to be running now and in which cPanel version it was updated? As for the report, it simply has a lot more info in it, which I assumed was due to a Clamav update. I'll look into it more once you provide the answers to the above. Then we can go from there - it may just be an update. -Pete
    0
  • Metro2
    I checked and I see Clamav 0.104.0-1.cp11100 in WHM. Or is this a tweaked older version of Clamav to fool their download server?

    I noticed this as well ;) Even though cPanel 102 has not made it to Release tier yet, on 101.0.8 and 101.0.9 the ClamAV version shows as the latest instead of the outdated. My GUESS is that cPanel developers have been working-in the necessary code for updated ClamAV and that the transitional code has made it to 101.0.8+, but that's just my guess. Considering that we know it is resolved in cPanel 102, I doubt that cPanel would resort to "fooling" the the ClamAV download server and this is a prep stage as 102 is about to reach Release and the initial fix could possibly be already implemented in CP 101.0.8 / 101.0.9 in a sort of beta capacity. Just giving the benefit of the doubt here, as I wouldn't know for sure, but in any case it's good to know that this long-time issue is about to be put to rest. (And I'll bet the CP devs have worked under pressure / are relieved as well).
    0
  • PeteS
    Yes, I'll be interested to see what @cPRex finds out.
    0
  • cPRex Jurassic Moderator
    @PeteS - I can confirm we wouldn't try and trick the download servers like that - that would get messy. The changes in the report are confirmed to be just part of the update. At this point we're expecting things to work in 100.0.9 and LTS 94. If you're NOT seeing that as the case, please let me know!
    0
  • PeteS
    @PeteS - I can confirm we wouldn't try and trick the download servers like that - that would get messy.

    I was mostly kidding... ;)
    The changes in the report are confirmed to be just part of the update.

    Thank you, I assumed so but wanted to confirm.
    At this point we're expecting things to work in 100.0.9 and LTS 94. If you're NOT seeing that as the case, please let me know!

    All appears well for me with 100.0.9.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.