Skip to main content

cpanelsolr high resource usage after recent cPanel update

Comments

42 comments

  • tui

    Any update?

    0
  • cPRex Jurassic Moderator

    I don't have any updates on this just yet.  I did speak with the developers just now about the issue so I can confirm things are being reviewed, but this case just hasn't been a high priority.

    0
  • Dezdan

    Any update on this case? I've been having the same issue for a few months now. 

    0
  • cPRex Jurassic Moderator

    Unfortunately I still don't have anything on my end.  If you're able to reproduce this could you please submit a ticket so we can see this in action?

    0
  • Dezdan

    Unfortunately I am in the same boat as others; I have a 'Partner Supported License' and I have an unsupported plan - I'll reach out to my provider, but it is unlikely anything will come of it. 

    0
  • GT-user

    Any solution? Or should I just add as exception the cpanelsolr to lfd?

    0
  • cPRex Jurassic Moderator

    GT-user- you should exclude this process, yes.

    0
  • Stefan Devroey

    cPRex Hiding it from your reporting by excluding it doesn’t make the error go away.

    0
  • cPRex Jurassic Moderator

    It's not our reporting, and it's not an error :) 

    0
  • Stefan Devroey

    This issue started after an update applied by your team. Since that update, the cpanelsolr process consistently consumes excessive system resources, without releasing them or cycling as it did before.

    Historically, cpanelsolr behaved as a short-lived, burst-based background process: after a mailbox change, it would wake up, process a limited batch, and then return to an idle state. That behavior was stable and predictable.

    Post-update, that behavior has clearly changed. The process now runs continuously, holding resources indefinitely. This is a regression, not a configuration issue on our side, and it is not acceptable behavior in a production environment.

    In addition, instead of actively assisting in diagnosing or resolving the problem, the response so far appears to be moving into a denial phase, rather than acknowledging the behavioral change introduced by the update.

    We are looking for acknowledgment of the regression and concrete remediation steps, not deflection.

    0
  • GT-user

    Stefan, please don't be too hard on them, they had a lot of work with the price increase plan.

    1
  • cPRex Jurassic Moderator

    GT-user - I'm not going to deal with trolling

    Stefan Devroey - just because the way the process runs changed doesn't mean it's bad or broken.  CSF/LFD just gives warnings about the process because it runs longer than an arbitrary threshold *and* CSF didn't get an update since we released this change.  If the only issue you're seeing is the complaint from CSF, you'll need to exclude the process from their checks.  That's the only solution that will keep that from happening.

    Now, if you're seeing another problem, such as extra resource usage or the service failing, that would be something we can look into.

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.